Wednesday, September 22, 2010

I WANT ONLY THOSE PEOPLE AROUND ME WHO ARE IN LOVE-----OSHO



If a woman cannot surrender to any man, it is not because men are lacking or men are not there. It is only because the woman has not grown, because only a grown-up can surrender because ONLY A GROWN-UP CAN BE COURAGEOUS ENOUGH TO SURRENDER. The woman has remained childish, retarded. Then with every man there will be problem.
AND IF YOU CANNOT SURRENDER IN LOVE, it will be very difficult for you to surrender at all. With a Master also there is a surrender, and a greater surrender than any man can ever demand, or any woman can ever demand. Because a man demands the surrender of your body if he is only related to you because of sex. If he loves you also, then he demands the surrender of your mind. But a Master demands of you -- mind, body, soul -- your total being. Less than that will not do.
THERE ARE THREE POSSIBILITIES. Whenever you come to a Master, the first possibility is TO BE RELATED WITH HIM INTELLECTUALLY, through the head. That is not much. You may like his ideas, but that doesn't mean that you like him. Liking the ideas, his attitudes, is not liking him. You can take the ideas separate; there is no need to fall in any relationship with the Master....
There is another possibility: YOU FALL IN LOVE WITH THE HEART. Then there is no question what he says; the question is he himself. If you are intellectually related to me, sooner or later you will have to go away. Because I WILL GO ON CONTRADICTING MYSELF -- one idea suits you, another may not suit. This idea you like, that idea you don't like -- and I will go on contradicting. And I contradict for a particular reason: because I WANT ONLY THOSE PEOPLE AROUND ME WHO ARE IN LOVE, not those who are intellectually convinced by me. To throw them away, I have to remain continuously paradoxical.
THIS IS A SCREENING, A VERY SUBTLE SCREENING. I never say to you that "Go away." You simply go on your own. And you feel good because this man was contradictory so you have left.
ONLY THOSE WHO ARE RELATED TO ME WITH THEIR HEART will not bother about the contradictions. They will not bother what I say; they look directly to me; they know me, so I cannot deceive them. They know me directly, not through what I say -- saying is not very important.
Look at the distinction: A PERSON WHO IS CONVINCED BY MY IDEAS is related to me through the ideas; A PERSON WHO IS IN LOVE WITH ME may be related to my ideas, but through me; and that makes a great difference.
THEN THERE IS A THIRD TYPE OF RELATIONSHIP which is possible only after the second type of relationship has happened. When you are really in love, LOVE BECOMES SO NATURAL, IT DISAPPEARS.
When I say "disappears" I don't mean that it disappears, I only mean that YOU ARE NO MORE AWARE THAT IT IS THERE. Are you aware of your breathing? When something goes wrong, yes -- when you are running fast and breathing is hard and you are out of breath, yes. But when you are resting in your chair and everything is good, are you aware of the breathing? No, there is no need. When there is a headache, only then you become aware of head -- something goes wrong. When the head is perfectly healthy, you are headless. This is the definition of health: WHEN THE BODY IS PERFECTLY HEALTHY, you don't know it... as if it is not there; you become bodiless. And this is the definition of perfect love also. LOVE IS THE ULTIMATE, THE HIGHEST HEALTH, because love makes one whole. When you love a Master, by and by, you completely forget about love. It has become so natural, like breathing.
THEN A THIRD TYPE OF RELATIONSHIP COMES INTO BEING which is neither of the head nor of the heart, but of the being itself. Heart and head are two layers; hidden behind them is THE CENTER OF YOUR BEING. You may call it the atma, the self, the soul or whatsoever you like. Because there, no distinction of words is anymore meaningful. You can call it no-self, anatma -- that will also do.
HEAD IS THE BEGINNING; don't get stuck there. HEART IS THE PASSAGE -- pass through it, but don't make a house there also. BEING TO BEING -- there are no boundaries then. Then in fact, THE DISCIPLE AND THE MASTER ARE NOT TWO. They exist as two, but one consciousness flows from one shore to another.
OSHO
Yoga: The Alpha and the Omega
Vol 3, Ch #2: Ego's attraction
am in Buddha Hall

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Osho, what is your message to humanity on this new year's day?

My message is simple. My message is a new man, homo novus. The old concept of man was of either/or; materialist or spiritualist, moral or immoral, sinner or saint. It was based on division, split. It created a schizophrenic humanity. The whole past of humanity has been sick, unhealthy, insane. In three thousand years, five thousand wars have been fought. This is just utterly mad; it is unbelievable. It is stupid, unintelligent, inhuman.

Once you divide man in two, you create misery and hell for him. He can never be healthy and can never be whole, the other half that has been denied will go on taking revenge. It will go on finding ways and means to overcome the part that you have imposed upon yourself. You will become a battle-ground, a civil war. That's what has been the case in the past.

In the past we were not able to create real human beings, but humanoids. A humanoid is one who looks like a human being but is utterly crippled, paralysed. He has not been allowed to bloom in his totality. He is half, and because he is half he is always in anguish and tension; he cannot celebrate. Only a whole man can celebrate. Celebration is the fragrance of being whole.

Only a tree that has lived wholly will flower. Man has not flowered yet.

The past has been very dark and dismal. It has been a dark night of the soul. And because it was repressive, it was bound to become aggressive. If something is repressed, man becomes aggressive, he loses all soft qualities. It was always so up to now. We have come to a point where the old has to be dropped and the new has to be heralded.

The new man will not be either/or; he will be both/and. The new man will be earthy and divine, worldly and other-worldly. The new man will accept his totality and he will live it without any inner division, he will not be split. His god will not be opposed to the devil, his morality will not be opposed to immorality; he will know no opposition. He will transcend duality, he will not be schizophrenic. With the new man there will come a new world, because the new man will perceive in a qualitatively different way and he will live a totally different life which has not been lived yet. He will be a mystic, a poet, a scientist, all together. He will not choose: he will be choicelessly himself.

That's what I teach: homo novus, a new man, not a humanoid. The humanoid is not a natural phenomenon. The humanoid is created by the society -- by the priest, the politician, the pedagogue. The humanoid is created, it is manufactured. Each child comes as a human being: total, whole, alive, without any split. Immediately the society starts suffocating him, stifling him, cutting him into fragments, telling him what to do and what not to do, what to be and what not to be. His wholeness is soon lost. He becomes guilty about his whole being. He denies much that is natural, and in that very denial he becomes uncreative. Now he will be only a fragment, and a fragment cannot dance, a fragment cannot sing, and a fragment is always suicidal because the fragment cannot know what life is. The humanoid cannot will on his own. Others have been willing for him -- his parents, the teachers, the leaders, the priests; they have taken all his willing. They will, they order; he simply follows. The humanoid is a slave.

I teach freedom. Now man has to destroy all kinds of bondages and he has to come out of all prisons -- no more slavery. Man has to become individual. He has to become rebellious. And whenever a man has become rebellious.... Once in a while a few people have escaped from the tyranny of the past, but only once in a while -- a Jesus here and there, a Buddha here and there. They are exceptions. And even these people, Buddha and Jesus, could not live totally. They tried, but the whole society was against it.

My concept of the new man is that he will be Zorba the Greek and he will also be Gautam the Buddha: the new man will be Zorba the Buddha. He will be sensuous and spiritual, physical, utterly physical, in the body, in the senses, enjoying the body and all that the body makes possible, and still a great consciousness, a great witnessing will be there. He will be Christ and Epicurus together.

The old man's ideal was renunciation; the new man's ideal will be rejoicing. And this new man is coming every day, he is arriving every day. People have not yet become aware of him. In fact he has already dawned. The old is dying, the old is on its death-bed. I don't mourn for it and I say please don't mourn for it. It is good that it dies, because out of its death the new will assert. The death of the old will be the beginning of the new. The new can come only when the old has died utterly.

Help the old to die and help the new to be born! And remember, the old has all the respectability, the whole past will be in his support; and the new will be a very strange phenomenon. The new will be so new that he will not be respected. Every effort will be made to destroy the new. The new cannot be respectable, but with the new is the future of the whole of humanity. The new has to be brought in.

My work consists in creating a Buddhafield, an energy-field, where the new can be born. I am only a midwife helping the new to come into a world which will not be accepting of it. The new will need much support from those who understand, from those who want some revolution to happen. And the time is ripe, it has never been so ripe. The time is right, it has never been so right. The new can assert itself, the break-through has become possible.

The old is so rotten that even with all support it cannot survive; it is doomed! We can delay, we can go on worshipping the old; that will be just delaying the process. The new has to come: at the most, we can help it to come sooner, or we can hinder it and delay its coming. It is good to help it. If it comes sooner, humanity can still have a future, and a great future: a future of freedom, a future of love, a future of joy.

I teach a new religion. This religion will not be Christianity and will not be Judaism and will not be Hinduism. This religion will not have any adjective to it. This religion will be purely a religious quality of being whole.

My sannyasins have to become the first rays of the sun that is going to come on the horizon. It is a tremendous task, it is an almost impossible task, but because it is impossible it is going to seduce all those who have any soul left in them. It is going to create a great longing in all those people who have some adventure hidden in their beings, who are courageous, brave, because it is really going to create a brave new world.

I talk of Buddha, I talk of Christ, I talk of Krishna, I talk of Zarathustra, so that all that is best and all that is good in the past can be preserved. But these are only a few exceptions. The whole humanity has lived in great slavery, chained, split, insane.

I say my message is simple, but it will be very hard, difficult, to make it happen. But the harder, the more impossible, it is, the greater is the challenge. And the time is right because religion has failed. science has failed. The time is right because the East has failed, the West has failed. Something of a higher synthesis is needed in which East and West can have a meeting, in which religion and science can have a meeting.

Religion failed because it was other-worldly and it neglected this world. And you cannot neglect this world; to neglect this world is to neglect your own roots. Science has failed because it neglected the other world, the inner, and you cannot neglect the flowers. Once you neglect the flowers, the innermost core of being, life loses all meaning. The tree needs roots, so man needs roots, and the roots can only be in the earth. The tree needs an open sky to grow, to come to a great foliage and to have thousands of flowers. Then only is the tree fulfilled, then only does the tree feel significance and meaning and life becomes relevant.

Man is a tree. Religion has failed because it is talking only of the flowers. Those flowers remain philosophical, abstract; they never materialise. They could not materialise because they were not supported by the earth. And science has failed because it cares only about the roots. The roots are ugly and there seems to be no flowering.

The West is suffering from too much science; the East has suffered from too much religion. Now we need a new humanity in which religion and science become two aspects of one man. And the bridge is going to be art. That's why I say that the new man will be a mystic, a poet and a scientist.

Between science and religion only art can be the bridge -- poetry, music, sculpture. Once we have brought this new man into existence, the earth can become for the first time what it is meant to become. It can become a paradise: this very body the Buddha, this very earth the paradise!

Osho, from: "Zorba The Buddha"

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

I don't know how to meditate, and I seem to be occupied all of the time. Please suggest what to do.

It is important to understand, because all the teachers of meditation in the world have been telling you that you have to keep a separate time for meditation. Mohammedans have to meditate five times in the day. Five times they have to close their shops, their businesses if they are real Mohammedans. But this is absolutely impractical. If the man is driving a railway train, or flying an aeroplane, and he has to stop five times, this is not going to be meditation, this is going to be a massacre!My approach about meditation is totally different. I do not say to you that you have to have a separate time for meditation. Meditation has to be just like breathing - you don't have a separate time for it, that in the morning you breathe and then you go to your business and forget breathing. You go on doing your things, and breathing continues.Meditation has to be something like that, that it runs like an undercurrent in your all activities of the day. I will suggest you a very simple meditation. Whatever you are doing - you may be digging a hole in the earth, planting new rosebushes in your garden, working in your shop, or fighting a case in the court - it does not matter what you are doing. Do it consciously, do it with full awareness.I will tell you what I mean by it. Once Buddha was passing in Shrivasti with his dearest disciple, Ananda. A fly came and sat on his forehead. Just as we will do, he simply waved his hand and the fly was gone. Then he stopped, and took his hand very carefully, very consciously. The fly was no more there, and he waved his hand with great grace. Ananda could not understand what is happening. He said, "You have the fly few minutes before, and it is gone. Now what are you doing?"And Buddha said, "That time I did it wrong. I did it without awareness. I continued to talk to you, and mechanically I simply waved my hand without being conscious of what I am doing. Now I am doing it as I should have done in the first place, to remind me that it does not happen again." Any action done with awareness becomes meditation.In the beginning it will be difficult, you will go on forgetting again and again. But don't be discouraged. Even if in twenty-four hours you can manage for twenty-four seconds, that is more than enough. Because the secret is the same. If you can manage it for one second, you know the key. You know the knack. Then it is only a question of time. Slowly, slowly, you will be having bigger gaps when you are aware. The action continues; not only it continues, it becomes better than ever before; because now you are doing with such consciousness. Its quality changes, because you are conscious, you are totally there. Your intensity changes, your insight, your understanding; and the action that you are doing starts having a grace of its own.Meditation should be slowly spread all over your life. Even while going to sleep, lying down on your bed, it will take few minutes for you to go to sleep. Those few minutes be alert, of the silence, of the darkness, of the relaxed body. Remain alert as sleep starts descending on you, till you are completely overwhelmed by the sleep, and you will be surprised that if you had continued to the very last moment when sleep took over you, in the morning the first thought will be again of awareness; because whatever is the last thought before you go to sleep is always the first thought in the morning when you wake up. Because it continues as an undercurrent in your sleep.You cannot find time, nobody has time. The day is so full. But six or eight hours in the night can be transformed into meditation. Even a Buddha will feel jealous of you. Even he cannot meditate eight hours. It is simply an intelligent effort to transform your sleep. You are taking a shower. Why not take it with awareness. Why take it mechanically? Just doing like a robot, because you have been doing it every day, so you go on doing it and it becomes mechanical. Do everything non-mechanically, and slowly, slowly meditation will not be a question that it needs separate time. It becomes spread all over your day, twenty four hours. Then only you are on the right track.The people who meditate ten minutes in the morning, are not going to gain much. Because ten minutes of meditation, and twenty-four hours against it, how you are going to win? You have to put twenty-four hours of meditation against twenty-four hours of ordinary life. Then there is absolute guarantee that success is going to be yours.Osho - The Last Testament, volume 5 #22

Monday, May 11, 2009

WITH MEDITATION ADDED TO IT, SEX BECOMES A TANTRIC EXPERIENCE

THREE WOODCUTTERS came down to the town after a long four-month work period, during which they had not seen or heard a thing except trees and their axes. Within hours they were totally drunk and decided to visit the local whorehouse. The madam of the institution found herself in a fix, as she could only offer two girls and didn't want to lose her third customer. So she told one of the girls to put the inflatable tailor's dummy into one bed. While two of the woodcutters were escorted to the beds with the real girls, the most drunk of them was put to bed with the dummy. As the three met the next morning, they exchanged the reports of their experiences. When the turn to share his experience came for the one who had been in bed with the air-filled rubber woman, he said, "First it was really nice, but she was too quiet. Then, when I bit her nipple, she gave one big fart and flew out of the window."

Ritmo and Mastananda, you will not be able to see what you are doing. BE A LITTLE MORE MEDITATIVE AND DON'T BE IN SUCH A HURRY: that I told you and right away... It seems it was just an excuse. You believed that you were experimenting, YOU BELIEVED THAT YOU WERE DOING SOMETHING IN ORDER TO KNOW. People can believe all kinds of things -- BUT YOU CANNOT DECEIVE ME! People can go on rationalizing. You think you did it because I said sex is stupid? You would have done it anyway! Even if I had said that sex is very intelligent, then too you would have done it. If I had not said anything about sex, then too you would have done it.

Have a look at your mind. Try to understand how you go on rationalizing and deceiving yourself. AND YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM SAYING UNLESS YOU RISE A LITTLE HIGHER from the state of consciousness where you are right now. If you want to see more, you have to rise a little higher.

It is as if you are standing on the road and I am sitting on the treetop. I say to you, "A bullock cart is coming down the road." You say, "I don't see any bullock cart. There is no bullock cart." BUT I CAN SEE -- MY PERSPECTIVE IS GREATER BECAUSE I AM ON A HEIGHT. You will only see the bullock cart when it comes very close to you, and then after few yards it will disappear again. And I will say to you, "It has not disappeared, it is still there on the road." You will say, "It is no more there, it is gone."

THE HIGHER YOU RISE, THE MORE YOU CAN SEE. And when you reach the ultimate height, Buddhahood, you can see everything. Then there is no past and no future; then there is only present. And in that clarity, SEX IS THE MOST STUPID THING -- BECAUSE IT KEEPS YOU IN BONDAGE THE LONGEST.

I AM NOT CONDEMNING IT, I AM SIMPLY STATING A FACT. It is your bondage. It keeps you unconscious. It does not allow you to see what you are doing. YOU ARE POSSESSED BY IT.

Back in the early 1960's when France was fighting its last colonial war, a draft-dodger from Paris pretended to have poor eyesight during his physical at the army induction center. The army doctor didn't buy that, so he sent for a gorgeous young nurse and told her to take off her clothes. "Describe what you see, young man," the doctor asked. "All I see is a blur, doctor," the slacker replied. Said the military M.D., "Your eyes may not be as good as they should be, my lad, but your prick is pointing straight toward Algeria!"

That's why I call it STUPID: IT KEEPS YOU UNCONSCIOUS, IT KEEPS YOU IN A KIND OF POSSESSION. It is hormonal, it is chemical. It is not you. IT IS JUST YOUR BIOLOGY THAT GOES ON FORCING YOU TO DO CERTAIN THINGS. If you watch, you will be surprised: What you are doing? And why you are doing? If you watch you will be surprised. WHAT YOU ARE GAINING OUT OF IT? What you have gained up to now? And in your saner moments you know perfectly well what I am saying, you understand it. But those saner moments are very superficial -- they come and go -- and soon you are again back in the same trap.

Mastananda, go back again, do it right away, but BE WATCHFUL, BE MEDITATIVE. AND I WILL BE THERE, STANDING BY YOUR SIDE. And let us see what happens. Either you will not be able to do it at all, or you will find that it is a biological compulsion, it is an obsession, it is not you. Your consciousness will remain floating up. Deep down in the valley it will happen, but you will remain detached, unconcerned, cool. And that will give you the INSIGHT.

SEX BECOMES A TANTRIC EXPERIENCE when meditation is added to it.

OSHOWalking in Zen, Sitting in ZenCh #1: The Breath of the Soulam in Buddha Hall[part 2 of 2]

Everybody is afraid of enlightenment

- OSHO, I AM AFRAID -- AFRAID OF ENLIGHTENMENT. WHAT IS BEYOND ENLIGHTENMENT? WHAT TO DO AFTER THE GOAL OF LIVING IS REACHED? WHAT DO YOU AIM FOR? IT IS LIKE FALLING INTO A BOTTOMLESS PIT. YOU FALL -- NO BOTTOM, NO GOAL. THEN WHAT DO YOU AIM FOR? WHAT IS BEYOND THE GOAL?Cliff -- obviously it is not my pilot Cliff, because the question does not show the guts of a pilot -- but whoever you are you have raised very significant questions. I am saying questions because there are many. You have condensed them into a very small question.First you are saying, "I am afraid, afraid of enlightenment." This can be taken as a general state of human mind; otherwise there is no reason why so few people have ever become enlightened. And those who have become enlightened have been shouting for centuries of its joy, its bliss; its ultimate truth, beauty; its eternity and its going beyond death. But the larger part of humanity has not paid any attention to it, naturally. Your question comes from the deepest core of humanity.It is not only your question, everybody is afraid of enlightenment. And the reason is clear why one is afraid: the fear is of losing yourself. For the same reason people are afraid of love; for the same reason people are afraid of trust; for the same reason they remain enclosed in all kinds of fears, miseries, anxieties and anguish, because at least these feel familiar. And one thing is certain, they don't ask you to be lost. The more painful your life is, the more you are.Perhaps deep down you desire pain, you desire misery, you desire anguish, because that keeps you clearly defined. You are afraid of the same things for which you also have a longing. On the one hand, there is a longing to go beyond all fears, beyond all anxieties, beyond all suffering. But the problem becomes complex, because being beyond suffering you are also beyond yourself -- you are the suffering. You are the prison, that's why you are afraid to get out of it. On the contrary, you try to console yourself in every way, that "This is not a prison, this is my home."So you are living in a dilemma: you want to go into the open sky and open your wings and fly across the sun. But on the other hand, you are afraid you may never be able to find the way back to your cozy, familiar space. Although it is painful you have become accustomed to it; although there is suffering it is like an old friend. The beyond invites you, calls you to take courage. But it also creates a trembling within you, because going out of the cozy circle of your misery and your hell, you know for certain -- you may not be very conscious of it -- that your so-called personality will melt away into the vast ocean, just like an ice block.The fear is, is there something beyond your personality? You are not aware of it, you have never come across it -- you have never met yourself. You know only the superficial that has been told to you. You don't know on your own authority your essential, your inner. And of course nobody else can say anything about your inner. It is not available for observation; it is not available to be an object. Science cannot find it. Logic feels absolutely inadequate. Reason has not the wings to fly to the inner.Karl Marx used to say, "I will believe in God only if he is caught in a test tube and scientists unanimously declare that this is God -- after dissection and autopsy to find whether he is really divine." Karl Marx was representative of you all, of the wider humanity; he is saying, "How can I believe in God? Science has no proof for it." And science has no proof either for your self. It can dissect you, it can cut you into as many parts as possible, but it will not find you; it will find only a dead corpse. Only very recently have geniuses become aware that what we have been doing in physiology, in biology, in medical sciences, is not right. The moment you take blood out of my body and then you test it, it is not the same blood that is flowing in my body. In my body it is alive, it has a life of its own; outside my body it is a dead thing. And you cannot conclude from the analysis of the dead about the living. You can take anything out of the human body, but the moment you take it out, you have taken it out as a dead thing. In the human body it was an organic, living, breathing, alive part.A few very sensitive medical surgeons have become aware of the fact that something has to be done about it, because in the medical colleges they go on studying the corpses, skeletons, to decide about living human beings -- there is such a great logical fallacy. But they are also feeling impotent -- how to approach life? All that they know is -- their whole technology, their whole methodology is to know -- the object, and you are not the object. Hence, science is never going to accept your living being -- it is beyond its limits. Logic cannot accept, reason cannot accept, philosophy cannot accept.And your fear, on top of it all, is that nobody is there to give you a certainty that beyond your superficial personality there is something more. You will disappear as you are, and you will appear in your authentic reality. This is the fear. People are afraid of coming closer to each other, even in love; they keep each other at arm's length. They want to come closer, but a fear... to be too close, you can be lost.With love, the problem is not so great -- but going beyond your ordinary self, your accepted face that you have seen in the mirror, that others have told you is very beautiful, or is ugly... All your knowledge about yourself is dependent on others' opinions.I used to have a very beautiful professor, Professor S.S. Roy. Now he is retired from the Allahabad University as head of the philosophy department. In fact, he was the cause of my going to the university where he was teaching in those days. He insisted. And I could not say no to him; he loved me too much.One day we discussed... and every day we were discussing a thousand and one things. Our relationship as student and professor had got lost long before; it had become a very deep friendship. And he loved sharp arguments; he himself was a great logician. And I said the same thing to him, "Your idea of yourself is only a collection of opinions of others; you don't know yourself."He said, "You will have to prove it."The next day I went to his wife -- and she was very loving towards me because I was always going to their home. She knew that her husband had never been interested in any student in this way. I had become almost part of the family; I had spent many days there, whenever he wanted. He invited me many times to his home to discuss his doctoral thesis, which had been accepted by Cambridge University -- he was working on the philosophy of Bradley in comparison to Shankara. Late into the nights we would go on discussing.I told his wife, "Tomorrow I am doing an experiment and you have to help me." She was all willing. It was a small experiment. I told her, "When Professor Roy gets up in the morning, you have to say to him: What is the matter? Could you not sleep? Just hold his hand: Do you have a fever? You look so pale. And write down exactly what he says."He said, "Who is looking pale? I am perfectly healthy. I have slept well and I don't have any fever. What kind of idea have you got?"She said, "I was thinking to call the doctor."He said, "Have you gone mad? When I am saying that I am perfectly okay... if there were fever I would know first. And I have seen my face in the mirror; there is no paleness or anything. Are you kidding or something?" She noted every single word the way he said it.I had talked with his gardener: "When he comes out to go to the university, just run and hold him, and tell him: You are wobbling, what is the matter? Are you feeling dizzy? And touching his hand, say: My God, you have fever!"And to the gardener, he said, "I could not sleep as deeply as I always sleep, and perhaps you are right. I am feeling a little dizzy. But I will go to the doctor." The medical department was very close to the philosophy department. So he said, "I will go."He used to walk; the distance was almost one mile. Next was the post office, and I had told the postmaster.. . and they were very close friends, because both were Bengalis. I had told the postmaster, "You be out when he comes by, and just say: Roy, I don't think you should go to the university today; you need rest. You look almost a faded shadow of yourself. You don't look to me... what has happened?"And to the postmaster he said, "I myself was thinking -- should I go? I have never been absent. I have never taken any holiday, but perhaps I should go and inform the department that it is difficult, and go to the doctor and come back."Just by his side used to live another professor, of economics, who had a beautiful car. And I had told him, "Tomorrow you should not come out of your house before Roy has passed the post office. Just watch, and then bring the car, and stop by his side and say to him, What is the matter, man? You come in. I will take you to the doctor, you are not in right condition to walk one mile."And Roy said, "You are perfectly right. I was wondering that if somebody comes I can ask for a lift. You are so kind. I am feeling dizzy; I could not sleep the whole night. And I have a strange fever that does not show on the body, but I know there is something feverish inside... perhaps a brain fever? I looked in the mirror and my face looks absolutely white." And he had said just the opposite to his wife just five minutes before!I told the professor of economics, Dr. Sahai, "The whole journey, go on talking about his sickness and tell him that it is old age, and not to be worried: It happens to everybody. Perhaps brain surgery... but don't be worried, I am here just by your side. I will take care of your family. My feeling is that you need hospitalization."And Roy said, "Hospitalization? I was thinking just a visit to the doctor will do."The professor of economics said, "You are not taking the thing seriously. Perhaps you have a brain tumor or something; otherwise, why are you feeling dizzy, wobbly, and a fever which is not showing on your body? On the contrary, your body seems to be cold. It must be something to do with your brain. You have been working too hard on your doctoral thesis. And I have told you there is no need. You have a doctorate; there is no need for another doctorate from Cambridge. You are unnecessarily. .. and you are now old. You should recognize that there is a time when one can work, and there is a time one should understand how far one is capable of going."And Roy said, "Perhaps you are right; I should drop that project. It is three-fourths complete -- what a pity that I have to drop it; it is a great thesis."Nobody had compared Shankara with Bradley, and both are very similar in their vision. But they were not acquainted with each other. Shankara was fourteen hundred years before Bradley, so there was no possibility for him to know about Bradley. Bradley was just in the beginning of this century, and even he was not aware of Shankara, because he was an original thinker. He was not interested in studying other philosophers; he was more interested to bring out his own ideas.But they have both come to the same conclusions.But Roy said, "Perhaps you are right -- I should not put too much strain on myself."And then I had told the peon in front of the department, who used to sit outside the department to give appointments and other things... he was a strong man. I told him, "You simply take Professor Roy in your hands. Even if he resists don't worry. I promise you there will be no trouble for you."He said, "If you promise, then there is no problem. So what do you want?"I said, "You should force him onto the sofa: Lie down! You are not in a state to walk or to sit, and I am going to call the doctor. And just note down what he says."And when he forced him there was no resistance. He was very happy, and said to the peon, "I never thought that you were so kind. I needed to rest. Now you bring the doctor."It was a very small, but very beautiful university -- perhaps the most uniquely situated in the whole of India, on a hill above a vast lake, and so many lotus flowers, and thick, lush greenery all around the university. The doctor came, because he was just next door, and I had told him, "Be ready. Inject him with just pure water. Do all kinds of testing, and tell him, "You are not in a position to do any mental work for at least three months. I hope that the brain tumor will subside by itself if you don't exert yourself. There will be no need for surgery, but one cannot be certain about such things, and I will have to talk to the head surgeon."And Professor Roy said, "You just bring your car and take me back home." And the head of the department had not yet come, so he told the doctor, "I am not in a position to write; you write that I am not feeling well and I am going back home, and perhaps it will take some time for me to get myself together." He signed the note, and you could see -- his handwriting was very beautiful, but that day his signature was shaky.Back home, he slept the whole day. He could not eat anything; he said, "I have no appetite." The wife became afraid about what kind of experiment I was doing. He was talking about a brain tumor, and surgery, and three months rest!And then I went and collected all the notes from everybody in serial number: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven... And I went to Professor Roy. He was under a blanket -- in hot summer! I said, "Just please read these notes."He said, "I am not in a position..."I said, "Don't be worried; I am in a position, I can read to you. From the very morning, these are your seven statements."And when he heard his statements, he said, "You rascal!" He threw away the blanket and he said, "Hell to that brain tumor; I have nothing. I knew from the very beginning that it was a strange conspiracy! But I never thought about you, that you would do such a thing to me. You could have killed me! I have to phone to the head surgeon because he is to come to check me and decide whether I should rest or an immediate operation is needed!"I said, "No operation is needed; the operation is complete! This is what I wanted to prove to you, that you live by the opinions of others, you are not independent. You can't trust even your own feeling that you are healthy. If so many people repeat something, you go on falling. Just look at your statements."This is your personality -- this is not your individuality. You cannot do such a thing with an individual who has a groundedness. The fear, Cliff, is because you don't have any experience of your innermost being; all that you know about yourself is what people have said. And these are the people who don't know anything about themselves -- what can they know about you?Everybody is afraid of enlightenment, because who knows? Once your personality disappears maybe everything disappears. Then what is the point of such an enlightenment? It is better to remain unenlightened -- at least you are. And death may come whenever it may come, but right now you are alive -- why unnecessarily commit a suicide?Enlightenment appears to your personality as a suicide, and in fact it is a suicide. But the suicide of personality is the beginning of individuality. The death of your personality and ego is the birth of your real authentic being, of your immortality. You will have to gather courage, and remember Michel's Rule for Prospective Mountain Climbers: The mountain gets steeper as you get closer to the top.So as you come closer to enlightenment -- and that is the greatest mountain -- it gets steeper, and more and more dangerous as you come close to the disappearance of your old personality with which you were so identified.But I tell you, I have survived. I have lost my personality; that's why I am not at all concerned what people think about me. The whole world is against me, but they don't even create a small stir in me. It does not matter whether they are against or for; it is their business, their problem. I know myself, and I know that what I am doing and what I am trying is intrinsically right. Nobody, just because they are in the majority, can destroy my truth.Truth has never been the opinion of the majority; it has always been an individual achievement. The majority is interested in crucifying the truth, but it is not ready to accept it.You can understand the psychology of it all. For two thousand years Christians have been thinking about Jesus and his crucifixion. And I am utterly disappointed with the whole two thousand years' theology, because they have not looked at the psychology of the crucifixion. Why did people crucify Jesus? He had not done any wrong; he has not committed any crime. But the majority was turning against him because he was telling them, "Drop your ego; be humble. Drop your so-called false identity; just be nobody. Blessed are those who stand last in the line."He was talking against the ambitious majority. They did not crucify Jesus, they crucified the truth that was hurting them and was making them afraid: if they become impressed by this man, there is a danger. They may lose half the bread in the hope of the whole bread, and there may not be any bread at all. It is better to keep the half and not to lose it in the hope of getting the whole. That is the majority's mind.You say, "I am afraid -- afraid of enlightenment." It is natural, so don't be serious about it. In a way, it is a good symptom -- at least you have become interested in enlightenment; otherwise, you would not be afraid. Just go into the town and you will not find anybody... ask people, "Are you afraid of enlightenment?" And they will say, "Why should we be afraid?" They have never bothered about it. It is not a problem to them, they have never thought about enlightenment. They will think you are crazy. "Why should we be afraid of enlightenment?"Just the other day I was looking at a newspaper clipping. It was a statement against me, that the world is coming to an end but I seem to be the only person who is not going to change, who is still talking about enlightenment. As far as I am concerned, I take it as a compliment. When the world is coming to an end, this is the right moment.Take the risk; anyway it is going to end.Why not take a chance and become enlightened?The world is coming to an end -- you will end with it. So now there is no fear: before the world ends, end your personality, and at least you will be saved. The world may end, but you will not end. And the person who has criticized me is right. I will go on insisting. My insistence will become more and more powerful as the end of the world comes near, to make more and more people interested in enlightenment because there is no problem about losing; you can put the fear aside.The fear is a good symptom -- it means you have become interested in enlightenment and your mind is trembling. You have become interested in the great adventure, the great affair, and your small personality is worried that this is the end. As for the small personality, which consists only of public opinions, it is going to dissolve -- naturally.It is said that every river before entering the ocean stops for a while and looks back -- a moment of hesitation about what she is going to do. Ahead is the vast ocean, in which she is going to be lost. Back, she had a personality of her own -- her own mountains, valleys, forests. The whole journey, long journey, maybe thousands of years, thousands of miles... Naturally, it is understandable to hesitate for a moment. But I have never seen any river go backwards. You can hesitate, but you cannot go backwards.Cliff, you have come to the cliff! You have to take the jump. Only by taking the jump will you prove your mettle."What is beyond enlightenment?" First things first! Out of fear you are thinking that it seems enlightenment is bound to happen; now be clear what is going to happen after it -- "What is beyond enlightenment?"Beyond enlightenment is all -- the whole universe. Beyond enlightenment you are no more a small dewdrop, you are the ocean."What to do after the goal of living is reached?" You are not supposed to do anything. I can see all your concerns are very human. You know one thing, that now you cannot avoid enlightenment; you may be afraid, but you have to take the jump. Naturally, you are asking, "What is beyond enlightenment?" And even if something is there -- "What to do after the goal of living is reached?"You have never thought about what you have done as far as your birth is concerned -- have you done anything? What are you doing as far as your life is concerned? Do you think you are breathing? If it was up to you to breathe, you would have been dead long before; just in anger, or in some love affair, you would forget to breathe. Or in the night, will you sleep or not? Or keep yourself awake just to continue breathing, because if you fall asleep and breathing stops, in the morning who is going to get up? No, breathing you are not doing.Existence is breathing.What are you doing as far as your inner structure of life is concerned? Do you digest? Are you responsible for changing food into blood, into bones, into marrow? These are not your concerns. Your concern ends with the taste buds, and the moment the food is swallowed it goes into the hands of existence; it is no more your concern.One day try to be continuously aware what is happening in your stomach, and then you will have a good disturbed stomach for at least one week! Your consciousness is not needed, the stomach is doing its work on its own. Your brain consists of seven million cells, and each cell is doing its own function, and you are not needed -- they don't even ask your advice. Has any part of your body stopped you sometime and asked you, "What to do? -- I am at a loss?" They are never at a loss; they are part of the cosmic organism. They have an inbuilt process; they go on doing their things.The moment you become enlightened and disappear into the ocean, you will not be asked to do something -- to type, or to dig, or to prepare piesta... or is it pizza! You are not supposed to do anything; you are gone. Now the universal force has taken possession of you. Things will be happening, but they will not be your doing."What do you aim for?" You have reached beyond aim. Aim is a concern of the ego. The ego cannot exist without an aim -- some ambition, some desire, some infatuation, something to be achieved tomorrow.The ego is a tension between today and the future. The moment there is no ego, there is no tension. You simply live in a state of let-go.Then, wherever the river takes you, wherever the life force takes you, you simply go. It is not your goal; you have become part of the whole. Now whatever is the goal of the whole... and I don't think there is any goal. The whole is perfectly happy in singing and dancing and enjoying; in flowers, in the wind, in the rain, in the sun, in the stars. There is no goal. The whole is perfectly happy just to be, herenow.If there is no aim, you start thinking it is like falling into a bottomless pit. Then what to do and what to aim for? "What is beyond the goal?" You are really in trouble! You will not be satisfied unless you are enlightened. All these problems: first, "What is the goal?" Then, "What is beyond the goal?" You want to determine the whole eternity!Your question should be just about enlightenment. Beyond that, existence takes care.Who has given you the name, Cliff? -- that's what I have been wondering. Such a dangerous name! Use your intelligence to see that the fear is arising out of the false in you, the fear is not arising out of the real. The real is really deeply challenged by the idea of enlightenment. But be intelligent; otherwise you may listen to the personality and forget to listen to the individuality.Meditate more, so that your intelligence can become more clear, unclouded, and all fears will disappear. And all other questions are just nonsense; they will also disappear. All that you need is a little more meditation, a little more sharpness of intelligence.Paddy and Maureen planned to get married, so they went to the doctor for a physical checkup. The doctor then tried to explain sex to them, but Paddy just listened with a dumb expression on his face. So the doctor took Maureen over to the examination table, made her lie down, and then made love to her. "Now do you understand?" said the physician."Yes," said Paddy, "but how often do I have to bring her in?"A great question! Just become enlightened, Cliff! Don't get worried about so many problems. You will be lost in a jungle of a thousand and one problems. And enlightenment is a simple process; it is just becoming your authentic self. And it is so luminous that in its light all darkness disappears, and with the darkness all the doubts, all the questions. And a tremendous insight arises that you are not separate from existence; hence there is no question of goal, no question of direction; no question where you are going, why you are going.Then just to be part of the whole is so immense and so overwhelming, one feels fulfilled and contented. There is nowhere to go; you have arrived.The theatrical agent, trying to sell a new strip act to a nightclub manager, was carrying on very excitedly about a girl's unbelievable seventy-two, twenty-six, forty, figure."What kind of dance does she do?" the manager inquired, impressed by the description of the girl's figure."Well, she doesn't actually dance at all," the agent replied. "She just crawls out onto the stage and tries to stand up!"With that kind of figure... how can you dance? Even if you can stand up, that's enough! Let me repeat the figure -- seventy-two, twenty-six, forty!Cliff, you have come to the right place. Here we are not giving you any goals, any heaven, any paradise. We are not selling any future to you. We are not in any business -- the churches are, the temples are, the synagogues are. I am teaching you that there is no goal and that there is no meaning, but there is great joy, and great love, and great blissfulness. And all that you have to pay for it is to drop your false ego, your false personality.Become silent. In your silence, all questions will disappear. And the dance will begin, whatever the figure! Because as far as your inner being is concerned, it has no figure; it is just a luminous flame which can dance. It has been eternally there, repressed by you. You are the greatest enemy of yourself. My effort is to turn you into the greatest friend of yourself.The InvitationChapter #5Chapter title: To hell with enlightenment!23 August 1987 am in Chuang Tzu Auditorium

THE SOCIETY USES MARRIAGE TO KEEP EVERYBODY UNDER CONTROL

Beloved Master, Can a married man also be a rebel?

Anil Bharti, The question that you have asked is really complex. A MARRIED MAN certainly can be a rebel, in fact he HAS ALL THE REASONS TO BE A REBEL. An unmarried man may not even think of rebellion, he may be thinking of getting married. But the married man cannot think of anything else except rebellion, although he only thinks of it.

THE BURDEN OF MARRIAGE IS TOO MUCH ON HIM: the burden of children, of parents, social responsibility, honor, and prestige -- he has too much to risk. Hence he can think very easily about rebellion -- but to take an actual step will need great courage. MARRIAGE, in fact, IS A PRECAUTION TAKEN BY THE SOCIETY THAT NOBODY BECOMES A REBEL, that nobody becomes an INDIVIDUAL.

MARRIAGE IS, IN ITS NAKED REALITY, A STRATEGY BY THE SOCIETY TO KEEP EVERYBODY UNDER CONTROL. And it is such a subtle way that nobody thinks -- at least in the beginning -- that IT IS GOING TO BE AN IMPRISONMENT, A LIFELONG SLAVERY. But marriage has been used by all the societies in the world, in all the ages past, as a PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPRISONMENT; putting so much burden and responsibility on every individual that he has to kneel down, and in Zarathustra' s words, has to become a CAMEL, A BEAST OF BURDEN.

CAMELS DON'T REBEL. On the contrary, the more burden a camel can carry the more precious he becomes. THE SAME IS THE SITUATION OF THE MARRIED MAN: the more burden he carries, of the old parents, of the small children, of the wife, the more respectable, the more honored he becomes in the society. These are the ways, INVISIBLE CHAINS, THAT WILL PREVENT A MAN FROM BECOMING A REBEL.

But this is only one side. The other side is, IF THE MAN HAS SOME COURAGE, some intelligence, the very burden, THE VERY IMPRISONMENT WILL BECOME THE CAUSE OF REBELLION. It is just a question of shifting your focus.

In all the religions, THERE IS A WAY ACCEPTABLE TO THE SOCIETY: that is OF RENOUNCING LIFE AND ESCAPING INTO A MONASTERY OR INTO THE MOUNTAINS... it is an escape, and every escape is cowardly. But the escape is acceptable -- not only acceptable but very prestigious. In the name of religion, in the name of searching for truth, the society allows the individual to escape and drop all responsibilities. THIS IS A KIND OF REBELLIOUSNESS, BUT THE REBELLIOUSNESS OF THE COWARD.

The married man has been doing it for centuries. It is part and parcel of the old civilization. It is just a small outlet. All doors should not be closed, otherwise the situation can be too suffocating. And there is a limit to tolerating suffocation. AND IF TOO MANY PEOPLE BECOME ANTAGONISTIC TO THE SITUATION IT WOULD BRING A REVOLUTION, A REBELLION. Hence every society gives an honorable escape. And nobody has ever counted how many people have suffered from this honorable strategy.

THOUSANDS of Christian monks, thousands of Buddhist monks, thousands of Jaina monks, thousands of Hindu monks -- their total number will be in the millions all around the world -- HAVE BECOME DROPOUTS, BUT IN A SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE WAY -- religiously, in the name of Jesus Christ, in the name of Gautam Buddha.

Because of these millions of monks, sadhus and saints, millions of parents have suffered in their old age, have become beggars; millions of children have become orphans, have become beggars, have become criminals; millions of women have become prostitutes. AND THE WHOLE RESPONSIBILITY GOES TO THE RELIGIONS because they honored the escapists.

JUST TO KEEP THE SOCIETY UNDER CONTROL, THEY HAD TO GIVE A LITTLE OUTLET, so the suffocation does not become too much. AND THEY HAD TO MAKE THIS ESCAPISM PRESTIGIOUS, SO NOBODY CONDEMNS IT, but on the contrary these cowards are being worshiped as great saints, sages. All that they had was a certain rebelliousness in their minds, but they were without guts. AND JUST A REBELLIOUSNESS IN THE MIND IS OF NO USE -- unless you can act accordingly, UNLESS YOU CAN RISK, unless you can take the danger.

The married man or unmarried man, the problem is the same: Are you ready to go against the whole past? ARE YOU READY TO GO AGAINST THE WHOLE WORLD? DO YOU HAVE THE COURAGE TO STAND ALONE? Will you not start feeling dizzy, seeing that the whole world is against you? Will you not start thinking that "Perhaps they are right, because they are so many and I am alone? Most probably I am not right." And the moment you start feeling this, you will start losing courage. You will start moving towards the prison again.

OSHOThe RebelChapter #30Chapter title: The slavery of marriage[1st in series]

THE SOCIETY USES MARRIAGE TO KEEP EVERYBODY UNDER CONTROL

Beloved Master, Can a married man also be a rebel?

Anil Bharti, The question that you have asked is really complex. A MARRIED MAN certainly can be a rebel, in fact he HAS ALL THE REASONS TO BE A REBEL. An unmarried man may not even think of rebellion, he may be thinking of getting married. But the married man cannot think of anything else except rebellion, although he only thinks of it.

THE BURDEN OF MARRIAGE IS TOO MUCH ON HIM: the burden of children, of parents, social responsibility, honor, and prestige -- he has too much to risk. Hence he can think very easily about rebellion -- but to take an actual step will need great courage. MARRIAGE, in fact, IS A PRECAUTION TAKEN BY THE SOCIETY THAT NOBODY BECOMES A REBEL, that nobody becomes an INDIVIDUAL.

MARRIAGE IS, IN ITS NAKED REALITY, A STRATEGY BY THE SOCIETY TO KEEP EVERYBODY UNDER CONTROL. And it is such a subtle way that nobody thinks -- at least in the beginning -- that IT IS GOING TO BE AN IMPRISONMENT, A LIFELONG SLAVERY. But marriage has been used by all the societies in the world, in all the ages past, as a PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPRISONMENT; putting so much burden and responsibility on every individual that he has to kneel down, and in Zarathustra' s words, has to become a CAMEL, A BEAST OF BURDEN.

CAMELS DON'T REBEL. On the contrary, the more burden a camel can carry the more precious he becomes. THE SAME IS THE SITUATION OF THE MARRIED MAN: the more burden he carries, of the old parents, of the small children, of the wife, the more respectable, the more honored he becomes in the society. These are the ways, INVISIBLE CHAINS, THAT WILL PREVENT A MAN FROM BECOMING A REBEL.

But this is only one side. The other side is, IF THE MAN HAS SOME COURAGE, some intelligence, the very burden, THE VERY IMPRISONMENT WILL BECOME THE CAUSE OF REBELLION. It is just a question of shifting your focus.

In all the religions, THERE IS A WAY ACCEPTABLE TO THE SOCIETY: that is OF RENOUNCING LIFE AND ESCAPING INTO A MONASTERY OR INTO THE MOUNTAINS... it is an escape, and every escape is cowardly. But the escape is acceptable -- not only acceptable but very prestigious. In the name of religion, in the name of searching for truth, the society allows the individual to escape and drop all responsibilities. THIS IS A KIND OF REBELLIOUSNESS, BUT THE REBELLIOUSNESS OF THE COWARD.

The married man has been doing it for centuries. It is part and parcel of the old civilization. It is just a small outlet. All doors should not be closed, otherwise the situation can be too suffocating. And there is a limit to tolerating suffocation. AND IF TOO MANY PEOPLE BECOME ANTAGONISTIC TO THE SITUATION IT WOULD BRING A REVOLUTION, A REBELLION. Hence every society gives an honorable escape. And nobody has ever counted how many people have suffered from this honorable strategy.

THOUSANDS of Christian monks, thousands of Buddhist monks, thousands of Jaina monks, thousands of Hindu monks -- their total number will be in the millions all around the world -- HAVE BECOME DROPOUTS, BUT IN A SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE WAY -- religiously, in the name of Jesus Christ, in the name of Gautam Buddha.

Because of these millions of monks, sadhus and saints, millions of parents have suffered in their old age, have become beggars; millions of children have become orphans, have become beggars, have become criminals; millions of women have become prostitutes. AND THE WHOLE RESPONSIBILITY GOES TO THE RELIGIONS because they honored the escapists.

JUST TO KEEP THE SOCIETY UNDER CONTROL, THEY HAD TO GIVE A LITTLE OUTLET, so the suffocation does not become too much. AND THEY HAD TO MAKE THIS ESCAPISM PRESTIGIOUS, SO NOBODY CONDEMNS IT, but on the contrary these cowards are being worshiped as great saints, sages. All that they had was a certain rebelliousness in their minds, but they were without guts. AND JUST A REBELLIOUSNESS IN THE MIND IS OF NO USE -- unless you can act accordingly, UNLESS YOU CAN RISK, unless you can take the danger.

The married man or unmarried man, the problem is the same: Are you ready to go against the whole past? ARE YOU READY TO GO AGAINST THE WHOLE WORLD? DO YOU HAVE THE COURAGE TO STAND ALONE? Will you not start feeling dizzy, seeing that the whole world is against you? Will you not start thinking that "Perhaps they are right, because they are so many and I am alone? Most probably I am not right." And the moment you start feeling this, you will start losing courage. You will start moving towards the prison again.

OSHOThe RebelChapter #30Chapter title: The slavery of marriage[1st in series]

SEX IS STUPID, IT KEEPS YOU ENGAGED IN THE OTHER, AVOIDING YOURSELF

Osho, After listening to you the other day and hearing SEX IS STUPID, we tried it right away. We don' t understand! What do you find stupid?

Ritmo and Deva Mastanando, I have been telling you of other things. Have you ever tried them right away? I AM TELLING YOU ABOUT MEDITATION EVERY DAY AND YOU GO ON POSTPONING IT! And sex you tried right away! You did me a great favor -- you did not try it HERE! That shows its stupidity.

SEX IS NOT STUPID, YOU ARE STUPID! It is because of you that poor sex also becomes stupid. And you will never know unless you rise a little higher. UNLESS YOU BECOME A LITTLE MORE ALERT, YOU WILL NOT SEE THE STUPIDITY. You can't see it by remaining on the same level -- nobody can see it.

Go to the madhouse, ask any madman, "Are you mad?" He will be mad at you! BUT NO MADMAN WILL ACCEPT THAT HE IS MAD. He will say, "What are you talking about? The whole world is mad, except me, I am perfectly sane." NO MADMAN ACCEPTS HE IS MAD. If a madman accepts he is mad, that is a sure sign that he is getting out of his madness, he is becoming sane.

YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEE THE STUPIDITY OF IT UNLESS YOU LEARN A LITTLE MORE MEDITATIVENESS so that you can observe, so that you can remain detached, so that you can see from a vantage point, so that you can have a little perspective. Right now you don't have any perspective; you are too close. Just stand very close to the mirror, your nose touching the mirror, and you will not be able to see your own face. That is not the fault of the mirror. You have to give it a little space, then the mirror can reflect you. YOU ARE TOO CLOSE.

SEX SEEMS TO BE THE GREATEST OBSESSION. The priests have to be given all credit for it. For centuries they have been condemning sex as sin, and they have made it an obsession.

I DON'T CALL SEX A SIN, I SIMPLY CALL IT STUPID. I am not saying that you will suffer Hell -- what more Hell do you need to suffer? You are already suffering in it. And what it goes on giving to you? JUST IT KEEPS YOU ENGAGED -- ENGAGED INTO THE OTHER SO THAT YOU CAN AVOID YOURSELF.

That is its basic stupidity. It keeps you ignorant because IT KEEPS YOU IGNORING YOURSELF. The man is interested in the woman, the woman is interested in the man. Everybody is interested in the other. IT SEEMS AS IF THE OTHER HAS ALL THAT YOU NEED, AND THE OTHER IS ALSO THINKING THAT YOU HAVE ALL THAT HE OR SHE NEEDS. Both are beggars -- believing that the other has the kingdom.

SOONER OR LATER YOU FEEL FRUSTRATED, BUT YOUR FRUSTRATION NEVER TEACHES YOU ANYTHING. It is very. difficult to learn anything. If one woman has failed you, you start looking to other women. If one man has not been up to your standards -- and no man can be, no woman can be. because that is not possible, that is not in the nature of things -- then you start looking to other men.

OSHOWalking in Zen, Sitting in ZenCh #1: The Breath of the Soulam in Buddha Hall[part 1 of 2]

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Buddha in Bazaar -


To meditate, Buddha left the city and sought isolation. Life in the city didn’t give him the space to be himself. But when he realized his potential, he returned to the city—to share what he had found in isolation.

The city’s hectic pace may compel an escape into solitude, where the seeker’s individuality can blossom. But this does no mean that it can blossom only in the jungle, not in a city say Delhi. It can—if we know how to meditate in the marketplace! Osho taught us how...

In a beautiful poem, Tagore says: “After Enlightenment, Buddha returns home. His wife asks him: ‘What you attained in the jungle—was it not possible to attain it here? Why leave home, me, your child?’” Buddha was silent.

Mystic Kabir says: “Kabira khada bazaar mein.” Yes, Kabir comes to the bazaar and urges people to gather courage, burn their houses of imagination, transform their lives… They can do so by meditation and following the path of love. Meditation blossoms into love, yielding a spontaneous sharing, like a flower shares its fragrance, unconditionally. Love is unconditional if rooted in meditation.

Ordinary relationships are based on conditional love. It’s a barter—you give me something, I give you something. And we keep calculating whether we profited or not! This calculation is not bliss but mundane mathematics. Real joy comes when one shares love without any conditions.

The marketplace can corrupt the minds of those who get lost in it. We need enlightened people like Kabir and Osho to remind us to stay in it yet rise—just like a lotus in mud. And you won’t find a better place than Delhi, with all its political tangles, cutthroat competition, mazes of ambition… It’s a real challenge to meditate in such an atmosphere.

One need not escape into isolation. One can meditate in the world itself, it one is intelligent. Osho suggests Vipassana (watching your breath and the gaps in breathing) as a meditation to be practiced amidst worldly activity. You are eating: Eat on but be attentive to the gap. You are walking: Walk on but be attentive to the gap. You are about to sleep: Lie down, let sleep come but mind the gap!

Don’t let your activity distract your mind. Exist in two layers—doing and being, circumference and center. And as you work on the periphery, attend on the core as well. Your activity will become an act, as if you’re playing a part. Let your entire life become a long drama. Become an actor playing roles, but constantly centred in the gap. Life is just a role, given to you by society, by circumstance, by culture, by family, by tradition, by nation, by situation...

Play on and focus on the gap between breaths. Let life move on, along the periphery, while you stay in the gap, in the core, in the center. This is the way to being a Buddha in the bazaar.

- Swami Chaitanya Keerti

The Times of India (What’s Hot) - 29 th August, 2008


Monday, September 22, 2008

Don’t Just Do Something. Sit There!

The Times of India (What's Hot) - 1st August, 2008

I see a basic reason. We think too much about ourselves. We think the whole world depends on your doing. Due to this illusory self-image, we lose touch with our real self. The image haunts us and we take on a false identity. One cannot relax with falseness. How can you relax with a shadow? The more we try to relax, the tenser we get! What will it take to let this illusory image recede and the real self emerge?

In The Discipline Of Transcendence, Osho talks about an ancient meditation method, still in use in a few Tibetan monasteries. It teaches us that, at times, we can simply disappearing. Sitting in the garden, you start feeling that you’re disappearing. Just see how the world looks when you have gone from it , when you’ve become absolutely transparent. Try for a single second ‘not to be’. In your own home, be as if you are not. Just think, one day you will still prepare breakfast, the kids will be gone—yet the radio will blare songs, the wife will still go to school…Just visualise this and become a ghost.

Think: “I have no more reality. I am not.” And see how the house continues. There will be tremendous silence. Everything will continue as is. Without you. Then what’s the point of always being occupied, doing something, obsessing with action? What’s the point? You will be gone. Whatsoever you have done will disappear, as if you had signed your name on sand, and it gets swept away by water...

It really is a beautiful way to meditate. You can try it often in 24 hours. Even half a second will do. For just half a second, simply stop! You are not… and the world continues. When you become more alert to the fact that, even without you, the world continues perfectly, then you will quickly discover that part of your being that has been neglected for too long. You will then enter a receptive mode.

You will simply allow, become a door. Things will happen without you. This is what the Buddha means when he says: “Become driftwood. Float in the stream like timber. And wherever the stream goes, let it take you. Don’t make any effort.” The Buddhist approach is receptive. That’s why you see the Buddha sitting under a tree. Sitting, doing nothing.

Osho adds: “To do good work is one thing, and to be good is another. I don’t say don’t do good work. I say let good work emerge from your BEING good. First reach the receptive, non-active mode. When your inner being flowers – and you are in tune with the integrated centre within – death suddenly disappears. All worries vanish because you are no more a body, no more a mind. Then arise compassion, love, prayer. You become a blessing to the world.”

- Swami Chaitanya Keerti


Be Conscious. Be Compassionate. Be Human.

The Times of India (What's Hot) - 8 th August, 2008

Here’s a beautiful story from the Buddha’s time: A rich man is initiated into sannyas by an enlightened master. He travels with the master and thousands of disciples. They rest at a guesthouse but there isn’t enough space, so some monks sleep outside the rooms. This rich man gets a spot on a pathway and can barely sleep. Miserable and agitated, he wants to revoke his decision to become a sannyasi.

Next morning, he informs his master. The master tells him about his past life, about how he became a human. He says, “Let me remind you that you were an elephant in your past life. One day, you were in a forest that caught fire. You stared running to escape, like all other animals. You rested under a tree that was not burning. As soon as you lifted a leg to walk on, a hare scampered under it for shelter. Your heart was full of compassion and you didn’t put your foot down, for that would have crushed the hare. You kept one foot up and soon the fire burnt you. That compassionate act helped you evolve into a human. Now, wouldn’t you like to evolve further into an awakened one, a Buddha?” This story awakened the rich man’s consciousness, and he continued on his journey of a sannyasi.

Compassion is the fragrance of awakened consciousness. A fully awake person is naturally compassionate, he doesn’t practice compassion as morality. He shares whatever he has. It is his joy. His bliss.

Osho explains: “Suffering makes people hard, dulls their sensitivity, makes them thick. To protect themselves, they grow a hard crust around their heart. If they continuously feel for every body who suffers, it will be impossible to live. Suffering is all over. People invent beautiful theories to protect themselves, like karma. Karma has nothing to do with the person who suffers but it gives good justification to he person who wants to avoid compassion. It is psychological armour.”

He adds: “Only bliss makes a person compassionate. If he has known joy, he’ll feel compassion for those who suffer. If he hasn’t known any joy, he’ll ask why he should feel compassion… He has suffered, so everybody will suffer!” When one discovers innermost joy, when one knows something of god, of love, of meditation—then a great compassion arises. One would like to share all that one has. One would like to pour one’s whole being. One would like all of existence to get enlightened. One would like everybody to celebrate.

“So,” says Osho, “I make bliss a prerequisite to compassion. I teach not compassion but bliss. Compassion comes of its own. Teaching people compassion is not the right way. Unless they taste joy, they’ll never be compassionate. It they’re convinced rationally, their compassion will be an obligation. So I teach bliss, and compassion comes as a shadow.”

- Swami Chaitanya Keerti

The Partnership of Love & Marriage



The Times of India (What's Hot) - 15th August, 2008

Mulla Nasruddin shook hands with the future groom. “Congratulations,” he said, “on one of the happiest days of your life.” The future groom said, “But I’m not getting married until tomorrow!” Mulla responded, “I know. That’s what makes this one of your happiest days!”

Having observed many couples and their fights over petty things, I conclude that they should give space to each other to stay sane. It seems that the problem is that they are together too much…24/7, stifling each other, killing each other’s individuality! A few moments or hours or days or months of aloneness can be really nourishing for each partner.

Before people become couples, they have sweet dreams of how they will be together and their life would be fragrant all the way. But when they are too ‘together’, they smell the real stink in their relationship. They cannot stand each other!

A man told Osho about his wife and their constant conflict. Osho remarked, “Seems you can’t understand each other.” The man exclaimed, “Understand? I can’t even stand her!”

This is a harsh fact. Many couples feel that they cannot stand each other, even though theirs was a love marriage. They are in constant strife… Osho says that the very basis for this struggle is that we reduce relating to relationship. “Why are we in such a hurry? Because to us, to relate is insecure and relationship is security! A relationship has certainty while relating is just a meeting of strangers. We’re so afraid of uncertainty that we want to make it predictable. We like tomorrow to fit into our ideas. We don’t want freedom to have its say. So we reduce every verb to a noun.”

If you love a woman or man, you immediately start to think of marriage. Of making it a legal contract. Why? How does law enter love? Law enters love when there is no love! It’s only a fantasy, which you know can disappear. Before it disappears, do something so it becomes impossible to separate.

Osho elaborates: “In a more meditative world, people will love immensely but their love will be a ‘relating’, and not a ‘relationship’. But I don’t say their love will be momentary. Their love may go way deeper than yours, may be more intimate, may have more poetry and godliness… And it may last longer than your so-called relationship. But it won’t be guaranteed by law, courts or cops! The guarantee will be inner, a commitment from the heart, a silent communion.”

True love has to be a commitment from one heart to another. It does not need to be verbalized, because to verbalise it is to render it profane. It has to be a silent commitment—eye to eye, heart to heart, being to being. It has to be truly understood, not said.

- Swami Chaitanya Keerti


Polarities of Life: The Power of Two

The Times of India (What's Hot) - 22 th August, 2008

Osho retells a Sumatran legend: “God created man and woman together, with joined bodies, so that each was a couple. But it became burdensome. If the husband wanted to go north, the wife was unwilling, so the bodies would have to be dragged together. Or vice versa! It was such a problem that God decided to divide them. But then they got lost in the wide world.” Sumatrans still believe that everyone has a partner somewhere, and that people are forever seeking him or her...

Osho narrates a Christian story: “Adam was very alone and very depressed. He asked God for a companion, so God created a woman. God asked Adam, ‘What will you call her?’ Adam was ecstatic to have someone to talk to, to love, to relate with! He said he’d call her ‘Eve’, ‘Eva’, ‘Havva’… ‘Why?’ asked God. Adam said, ‘Because that means life. She is my life. Without her, I was nearly dead.’”

When deeply in love, a woman becomes God for the man, and vice versa, though ultimately they are just two manifestations of one soul. They are soul mates. The flipside: Often, men and women meet and get go fascinated with each other that they think they have found their soul mates. Then they start living together and find that they are living with the wrong person! Such is the power of imagination that takes love to such peaks, only to throw it into abysmal valleys later!

There’s a polarity of peaks and valleys in relationships. We believe anything when we are in love and the absolute opposite when love disappears. Life manifests these two aspects of illusion and disillusionment.

In Secret of Secrets, Osho elaborates: “In ordinary life, you stay dual. And in the space of 24 hours, you change often from one pole to the other. Watch. You may be a man but, at times, you’re feminine, very vulnerable. You may be a woman but, at times, you’re masculine. When a woman is masculine, she’s very aggressive, more aggressive than any man, because her aggressiveness has been lying unused. Similarly, if a man is tender, he is much more so than a woman...”

Osho adds: “This inner polarity keeps you in a kind of conflict, without which you can’t exist. The One stays invisible, like God. To be visible, the One must split into two. To exist, one needs contrast. That’s why you can’t see stars in the day but you can in the night, when darkness provides a backdrop. The stars are there in the day too but there’s no contrast, no Other.”

- Swami Chaitanya Keerti



Trial by Marriage



The idea of trial marriage is nothing new; secular freethinkers have been proposing it for a number of years. But facing the large number of youthful weddings that end in divorce, some reputable Christian theologians today are cautiously debating whether temporary liaisons make good common as well as spiritual sense.

Speaking last month to a Protestant conference on welfare work in West Germany, Theologian Siegfried Keil of Marburg University argued that while sexual mores have quite obviously changed during the 2,000 years of Christian history, churchmen nonetheless continue to act as if there were a permanent, inflexible standard of behavior. "Why," he asked, "should it not be conceivable to think of the act of marriage as being divided into several stages, from single life to matrimony?" One such interim stage, he suggested, might be a "recognized premarriage," during which sexual relations by the couple would not be condemned as sinful.

Under Strict Controls. Roman Catholic Father Jacques Lazure, a Harvard-educated sociologist who is on the staff of the University of Montreal, has tentatively proposed that the church might some day consider the institution of "probationary marriages" as an antidote to the high divorce rate among the young. Lazure—who was promptly silenced by his superiors after explaining his views to the Toronto Star—suggested that trial marriages, if ever they are authorized, ought to be surrounded with strict social and ecclesiastical controls. The couples involved should be at least 18 years old, and would be required to practice birth control. Sanctioned by both church and state, such unions might last anywhere from three to 18 months, and could be readily dissolved at the request of either party. Hopefully, however, most would end in permanent marriage.

Although most U.S. theologians are somewhat reluctant to openly challenge traditional church views on the indissolubility of marriage and the sinfulness of premarital sex, there is some support for these proposals. Says Dr. Edward Craig Hobbs of Berkeley's Episcopal Church Divinity School of the Pacific: "Something like trial marriage would be vastly superior to our present system, which is marriage, divorce and remarriage." In addition Dr. Robert Lee of San Francisco Theological Seminary argues that since "intercourse during engagement is becoming standard," the time of betrothal, in effect, "has become a trial marriage."

Paying an Indemnity. Another theologian intrigued by the idea of trial marriages is William Hamilton of Colgate-Rochester Divinity School, one of the leading "Death-of-God" thinkers, who suggests that a betrothal period in which sexual relations are licit would actually be in accord with the marital patterns that prevailed in the time of Christ. Under early Jewish custom, couples who became betrothed often lived as man and wife, without being required to enter permanent marriage. By this custom, if either party objected to formalizing the union, it could be dissolved by a religious court.

From http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,836993,00.html

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

The Bhakti Bhav In Hindustani Music--THE SPEAKING TREE




Rasa and rang do play a significant role in Hindustani classical music. But, its spiritual life force
or prana has much deeper roots.
Anhad naad, the unstruck sound or naad has been mentioned by saints like Kabir and Mira, as
the music heard within the depths of one’s being. Anhad naad is a divine melody, a celestial
music which is transcendent, beyond the senses and intellect. It can neither be sung nor heard.
It can be contacted by the soul alone. Anhad naad and soul are in essence the same as God.
There is therefore a natural spiritual magnetic attraction between them. So when a listener’s
soul is turned towards the anhad naad within it is drawn like a needle to a magnet.
In the realm of Nirakar, the Unmanifest Supreme God, like every thing else in Creation, music
too is in its potentiality only. But this potentiality is the thing that eventually takes form —
aakaar — as music in our physical world when sung or played.
The pleasure or satisfaction experienced by the listener as rasa and rang is due to the union
of the manifest music with the unmanifest anhad naad deep within the listener.
The relationship between the listener’s soul and anhad naad within her being is like that
between the struck — baaj ke taar — strings of a sitar and its unstruck sympathetic strings or
tarben which resonate only by the vibrations caused by the struck strings. The musicality of the
sound produced by the struck strings is hollow and incomplete without the complementary
sound lent by the sympathetic unstruck strings. That is why sitar maestros give so much time
and attention to the fine-tuning of the tarben.
The same applies to the listener of Hindustani classical music. The more finely attuned are
her soul and the inner celestial melody, the deeper and more fulfilling will be the music heard
by her. This is why everybody does not appreciate or enjoy music to the same extent or
intensity. The fine-tuning of body and soul differs from person to person.
Every lover of classical Hindustani music may not be aware of the anhad naad within, like an
accomplished saint, but anhad is very much there as an integral part of the Supreme Akhand
and Anant or Oneness of the unmanifest or Nirakar and the manifest or Sakar.
Brahmn is “Shabdabrahmaswaroop”. He is manifest when audible (Omkaar or Om+aakaar)
and unmanifest when dormant and formless as “OM” in Brahmn.
Only a true and perfect maestro can join the disciples’ soul with the anhad naad within. We
cannot achieve this by reading books or listening to the recordings of past maestros. Anhad
naad is a transcendent entity and therefore cannot be conveyed or given to others indirectly.
Reciprocity is a must. Only a living person can open the current of the divine melody within
us. If his own soul has awakened to this anhad naad, he can awaken other souls too.
Our own zeal and practice do matter, but these too are part of the guru’s grace only. The
guru, performing artist’s soul, the listener’s soul, God and anhad naad, are one and the same.
Little wonder then that Pandit Amarnath finds bhakti bhav the essential underlying rasa in
Hindustani classical music. But bhakti bhav is the outcome of the spiritual roots of Hindustani
music. It is not the other way round.


Times Of India Mumbai; Date:2008 Aug 28; Section:Editorial; Page Number16

THE ROOT PROBLEM OF ALL PROBLEMS

The root problem of all problems is mind itself. The first thing to be understood is what this mind is, of what stuff it is made; whether it is an entity or just a process; whether it is substantial, or just dreamlike. And unless you know the nature of the mind, you will not be able to solve any problems of your life. 

You may try hard, but if you try to solve single, individual problems, you are bound to be a failure -- that is absolutely certain -- because in fact no individual problem exists: mind is the problem. If you solve this problem or that, it won't help because the root remains untouched. 

It is just like cutting branches of a tree, pruning the leaves, and not uprooting it. New leaves will come, new branches will sprout -- even more than before; pruning helps a tree to become thicker. Unless you know how to uproot it, your fight is baseless, it is foolish. You will destroy yourself, not the tree. 

In fighting you will waste your energy, time, life, and the tree will go on becoming more and more strong, far thicker and dense. And you will be surprised what is happening: you are doing so much hard work, trying to solve this problem and that, and they go on growing, increasing. Even if one problem is solved, suddenly ten problems take its place. 

Don't try to solve individual, single problems -- there are none: mind itself is the problem. But mind is hidden underground; that's why I call it the root, it is not apparent. Whenever you come across a problem the problem is above ground, you can see it -- that's why you are deceived by it. 
 

Always remember, the visible is never the root; the root always remains invisible, the root is always hidden. Never fight with the visible; otherwise you will fight with shadows. You may waste yourself, but there cannot be any transformation in your life, the same problems will crop up again and again and again. You can observe your own life and you will see what I mean. I am not talking about any theory about the mind, just the "facticity" of it. This is the fact: mind has to be solved. 

People usually  ask: "How to attain a peaceful mind?" I say to them: "There exists nothing like that: a peaceful mind. Never heard of it." 

Mind is never peaceful -- no-mind is peace. Mind itself can never be peaceful, silent. The very nature of the mind is to be tense, to be in confusion. Mind can never be clear, it cannot have clarity, because mind is by nature confusion, cloudiness. Clarity is possible without mind, peace is possible without mind, and silence is possible without mind -- so never try to attain a silent mind. If you do, from the very beginning you are moving in an impossible dimension. 

So the first thing is to understand the nature of the mind, only then can something be done. 
 

Dated: 27 May 2008

Place : Mumbai      S.K.Gupta